REID COLLINS NAMED 2024 NATIONAL BOUTIQUE FINALIST FOR THE AMERICAN LAWYER INDUSTRY AWARDS
Reid Collins & Tsai LLP has been named a finalist for National Boutique/Specialty Litigation Department of the Year by The American Lawyer Industry Awards (TALIA).
The editors and reporters of The American Lawyer and Law.com research the field and “review hundreds of compelling submissions and nominations” to highlight “the industry’s most impactful, innovative and otherwise excellent work.”
The winners and finalists will be honored at the awards dinner in New York City on November 13, 2024.
Click here to view the finalists and honorees.
EIGHT REID COLLINS ATTORNEYS RECOGNIZED BY BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA®
The Best Lawyers in America®, the “oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession,” has recognized eight Reid Collins attorneys in its new edition.
Partners Eric D. Madden, William T. Reid, IV, and Michael Yoder have been selected by their peers for inclusion as 2025 Best Lawyers® and Ryan M. Goldstein, Yonah Jaffe, Morgan M. Menchaca, Scott D. Saldaña, and Jeremy Wells were named to the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® recognizing practitioners who, early in their careers, have developed outstanding reputations for professional excellence in private practice in the United States.
Selection by Best Lawyers® is based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation methodology designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within their geographical and legal practice areas.
Click here to view the profiles.
LAW360 PUBLISHES ANALYSIS ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY BY JEFF GROSS AND ROB LACROIX
In December 2023, an amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which governs the admissibility of expert testimony, went into effect – the rule’s first substantive amendment in two decades. Legal newswire Law360 published an article by Reid Collins Partner Jeff Gross and associate Rob LaCroix analyzing the amendment and how it does not address a lurking problem: while courts still consider whether experts’ work has been peer-reviewed, the value of peer review itself is debatable following the “replication crisis” (when scientists are unable to reproduce the results of previous studies) in the scientific community.
Click here to read Jeff and Rob’s full analysis – “Expert Witness Standards Must Consider Peer Review Crisis.”
